Employer costs in Germany
Last reviewed
The short answer
An employer in Germany pays about 21.30% of gross pay in statutory social contributions on earnings up to EUR 5,812.50 a month: 8.75% to health insurance, 1.80% to long-term care, 9.30% to the pension scheme, 1.30% to unemployment insurance and a 0.15% insolvency levy. The health figure uses the 2.9% average supplementary rate and each health fund sets its own, so the exact total follows the fund the employee chooses.
Two ceilings then cut the loading in steps. Health and care contributions stop at EUR 5,812.50 a month and pension, unemployment and the insolvency levy stop at EUR 8,450, so the marginal rate falls to 10.75% between the two and to nothing at those rates above the higher one. Accident insurance and the maternity levy sit outside all of it: they are set by the employer's sector body and the employee's health fund and accident insurance runs on the sector body's own maximum, which starts at EUR 94,920 a year, rather than on either social-insurance ceiling.
Aspirock prices a German engagement from the contribution stack that applies to the actual salary rather than from a blended average and identifies the variable elements separately.
What does an employer actually pay on top of salary?
The headline German employer rate is built from five statutory contributions, four of them shared with the employee and one of them the employer's alone. On pay up to EUR 5,812.50 a month they come to about 21.30% of gross. Three further employer-only items sit outside that figure and are covered below.
| Contribution | Total rate | Employer share | Assessed up to |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health insurance | 14.6% plus the fund's supplementary rate | 8.75% at the 2.9% average | EUR 5,812.50 a month |
| Long-term care insurance | 3.6% | 1.80% | EUR 5,812.50 a month |
| Pension insurance | 18.6% | 9.30% | EUR 8,450 a month |
| Unemployment insurance | 2.6% | 1.30% | EUR 8,450 a month |
| Insolvency levy | 0.15% | 0.15%, employer only | EUR 8,450 a month |
Only 19.85 points of that 21.30% are fixed by law. The remaining 1.45 is half of the supplementary health rate and that rate is set by each health fund rather than nationally. The 2.9% used here is the statutory average for 2026. Individual funds sit meaningfully above and below it, so the employer's true total varies with the fund the employee chooses, which is the employee's decision and not the employer's.
One regional variation matters. In Saxony the employee bears half a percentage point more of care insurance and the employer half a point less, so the employer's care share is 1.30% rather than 1.80%. That is because Saxony was the only federal state that did not give up a public holiday when the care scheme came in. A Saxon employer's total is 20.80% rather than 21.30%.
Why does the loading fall as salary rises?
Because German contributions are capped and the two caps sit at different levels. Health and care stop at EUR 5,812.50 a month. Pension, unemployment and the insolvency levy run to EUR 8,450. The employer's marginal rate therefore steps down twice rather than tapering.
| Band of monthly gross | Marginal employer rate | Still assessed in this band |
|---|---|---|
| Up to EUR 5,812.50 | About 21.30% | All five contributions |
| EUR 5,812.50 to EUR 8,450 | 10.75% | Pension, unemployment, insolvency levy |
| Above EUR 8,450 | Nothing at these rates | Accident insurance only, on the sector body's own maximum, which may already have stopped |
The practical effect is that the headline percentage overstates the statutory stack on a senior hire, though it can understate the total in the other direction where the employee's health fund charges above the average supplementary rate and before the three further employer-only items below are added. A company modelling a German team on a single blended loading will over-provision at the top of the salary range, sometimes by a wide margin, which is a budgeting problem rather than a compliance one but is worth knowing before a business case is signed.
What does the arithmetic look like on a real salary?
The example below is stated on annual contractual gross salary, with contributions computed month by month against the 2026 ceilings, because the ceilings are monthly figures and an annual average would smooth away the step.
A salary inside the first band
At EUR 5,000 a month, every contribution is assessed on the full amount, because EUR 5,000 sits below both ceilings. The employer pays about 21.30%, which is roughly EUR 1,065 a month, or about EUR 12,780 over a year on top of EUR 60,000 of salary.
Accident insurance and the maternity levy are additional and are not in that figure, because neither has a national rate.
A salary above both ceilings
At EUR 10,000 a month, health and care are assessed only on the first EUR 5,812.50 and pension, unemployment and the insolvency levy only on the first EUR 8,450. The employer pays about EUR 1,522 a month rather than the EUR 2,130 a flat 21.30% would suggest.
That is roughly 15.2% of gross rather than 21.30%, and the gap widens with every further euro of salary.
What sits outside the headline rate?
Three employer-only items, none of which can be quoted from a national table and one of which behaves differently from everything above.
Accident insurance is compulsory, employer-funded and administered by the sector Berufsgenossenschaft, which sets its own risk tariff. It is assessed on that body's own maximum annual earnings figure rather than on either social-insurance ceiling. That maximum starts at EUR 94,920 a year, which is EUR 7,910 a month, so for an employer whose sector body sits at the statutory minimum, accident insurance actually stops before the pension ceiling. Some sector bodies set it high enough to run past both. Which applies depends on the employer's sector, not on the salary.
The maternity levy is payable by employers generally, with no size threshold and is set by the employee's health fund. The sick-pay levy is payable only by employers with no more than 30 staff and is likewise set by the fund. Both are real cost and neither has a published national figure.
What floors the pay of a supplied worker?
Where the arrangement is employee leasing under the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz, pay is not simply a negotiation. Two instruments apply in order.
A regulation made under section 3a sets a minimum hourly rate for supplied workers that is separate from, and higher than, the general statutory minimum wage. Under the Seventh Wage Floor Regulation that rate is EUR 14.96 an hour, rising to EUR 15.33 on 1 September 2026 and EUR 15.87 on 1 April 2027. The general minimum wage over the same period is EUR 13.90, rising to EUR 14.60 in January 2027. A cost model built on the general minimum wage therefore understates the floor for a supplied worker by between roughly EUR 0.73 and EUR 1.43 an hour, depending on the date, because the two figures step on different calendars.
Above that floor, section 8(1) makes the pay of a comparable employee in the hirer's own establishment the default. A collective agreement for the temporary-work sector can derogate on pay for the first nine months of an assignment and for longer where it steps the worker up to a rate the agreement defines as equivalent to the user sector's collective rate by month fifteen. An employer that has not signed such an agreement can adopt it by reference. The derogation can also run beyond month fifteen, provided the agreement steps the worker up to a rate it defines as equivalent to the user sector's collective rate, beginning after an induction period of no more than six weeks and reaching it by month fifteen at the latest. So the question is never simply when equal treatment starts: it is which agreement applies and what that agreement pays. That is a question about the applicable collective agreement rather than about the provider's price list and it is answered before a placement rather than during one. The mechanism is set out on the AÜG licence page.
What should a German budget carry that a rate card does not?
Four things, none of which can be quoted from a national table. The supplementary health rate the employee's fund actually charges, rather than the national average. The sector accident-insurance tariff, which no provider can quote without knowing the sector body. The maternity levy and the sick-pay levy, where the employer is small enough to owe the second. Finally, where the arrangement is employee leasing, which collective agreement governs pay plus what it actually pays, since that is set by the agreement rather than by the contract with the provider.
The provider
About Aspirock
Aspirock is an Employer of Record and payroll provider operating across 70+ countries from six global offices, founded on more than 22 years of operational EOR experience and supporting more than 5,000 workers. Every client works with a named account team that owns the deployment end to end, so contracts, payroll, visas, and compliance filings in each market are handled by people accountable for the outcome.
For hires in Germany that means German payroll with wage tax withheld and contributions paid to the employee's chosen health fund, the two contribution ceilings applied at the right points, statutory notice and holiday under the Civil Code and the Federal Holiday Act and the employee leasing rules in the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz where the arrangement falls inside them.
Common questions
Frequently asked questions
Last reviewed
On top of gross salary, an employer pays about 21.30% in statutory social contributions on pay up to EUR 5,812.50 a month, made up of 8.75% health, 1.80% long-term care, 9.30% pension, 1.30% unemployment and a 0.15% insolvency levy. The health element assumes the 2.9% average supplementary rate for 2026, which each health fund sets individually, so the figure moves with the employee's fund. Above EUR 5,812.50 health and care contributions stop, so the marginal rate falls to 10.75% until pay reaches EUR 8,450 a month, after which nothing further is due at those rates. Accident insurance and the maternity levy are additional and vary by sector and health fund and accident insurance is capped by the sector body's own maximum rather than by either social-insurance ceiling.
Because German social contributions are capped and the caps sit at two different levels. Health and long-term care contributions are assessed only on pay up to EUR 5,812.50 a month, while pension, unemployment and the insolvency levy run to EUR 8,450 a month. An employer therefore pays about 21.30% on the first band, 10.75% on the second and nothing at those rates above it, so the cost of a senior hire as a proportion of salary is lower than the headline rate suggests. Accident insurance is the exception, because it is assessed on the sector body's own maximum rather than on either social-insurance ceiling.
The general statutory minimum wage is EUR 13.90 per hour from 1 January 2026 and rises to EUR 14.60 from 1 January 2027, set by the Fifth Minimum Wage Adjustment Ordinance following the Minimum Wage Commission's decision of 27 June 2025. A worker supplied under the employee leasing rules has a separate and higher floor set by regulation under section 3a of the Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz: EUR 14.96 an hour from 1 July 2026, EUR 15.33 from 1 September 2026 and EUR 15.87 from 1 April 2027. Section 8(1) can lift pay above that floor again, to the level of a comparable employee in the hirer's establishment.
No. A 13th month salary is not a statutory entitlement in Germany. Entitlement arises only from the employment contract, a collective agreement, a works agreement or established practice, in which case it binds on that basis rather than by statute. An employer budgeting a German hire should treat it as a negotiated element of the package and check whether any applicable collective agreement provides for it.
Aspirock prices a German engagement from the statutory contribution stack that applies to the actual salary, so the two contribution ceilings and their effect on the marginal rate are reflected rather than averaged. Variable elements are identified separately, principally accident insurance, the maternity levy and the employee's choice of health fund, because those depend on the sector body and the fund rather than on a national rate. A named account team owns the model and the deployment behind it and confirms the full cost position in writing before an agreement is signed.
Ready to deploy staff into Germany?
Get a deployment plan covering employment setup, timeline, and costs. One conversation, no obligation.
General guidance on Germany employment rules, reviewed 5 August 2026. Rates and rules change. This is not legal or tax advice for a specific situation.